I have learned a lot about effective teaching strategies when integrating technology into the classroom during this course. First and foremost, I have learned that the most critical part of using any new technology in the classroom is to do extensive research, evaluation, and clarification of not only the technology, but the purpose of it or problem of practice you are trying to solve with it. I think too often we get caught up in the bells and whistles and “promises” of the actual technology itself before we really stop to analyze and address the true “solution” it may provide, if any. There is so much out there to weed through and evaluate that sometimes we get stuck in a rut. Just like using Google to do searches all the time. Every teacher I know will tell you that there is never enough time in the day to get through everything we want to with our students. We certainly don’t need “fluff” to fill time. It is critical that everything we implement has a clear purpose and is truly “change with a difference.”
Web-based technologies are very valuable and accessible but that doesn’t mean that they are all worthwhile. It has been such a pleasure to share our resources as a community of educators. I have discovered so many resources that I never knew even existed. Again, evaluation and research, prior to implementation, is key. The nice thing about sharing our favorite sites and “tricks and tips” is that you can utilize someone else’s experiences with the site and that saves a great deal of time and energy which is something that we can all benefit from!
My own personal goal for learning about technology integration during this course has been met in just the past few days when I realized how far I have come! When I began this course I was still quite timid about solving problems using technology and feeling comfortable and confident when trying something new. Wow, have I come a long way! I am now the family member and staff member people are turning to for advice and help in this area. Me, little old me, the one who just a few short weeks ago was asking others for help whenever there was a problem I was struggling with. I am now educated enough and confident enough to find solutions to my own problems. When I couldn’t get my podcast to download to my blog, instead of waiting for my husband to get home or asking someone at school how to do it, I immediately went online, did the research, downloaded a tutorial, and figured it out all by myself. The amazing thing is, I even understood WHY it wasn’t working and how I fixed it. Now that is progress for someone who really only knew how to email and use Word in the fall.
Of course a lack of time for using all the new technology we came across during this course has been one area that has hindered my learning and achieving the maximum benefit from the course. I could honestly just get lost for days checking out new web-based technologies and programs to use. Unfortunately, this is not a reality and probably not healthy either. It is all about balance. Too bad I need to sleep!
I am comfortable enough with technology integration that I am advising and giving great resources to other teachers in my building that I am subbing for. I can use the Promethean Boards and flipcharts with confidence and go to the computer lab with students and teach them something new for a change!
Yes, I do have new goals both short and long term for integrating technology into my future classroom and using it at home with my own children. I have been teaching my own children how to use Audacity and Movie Maker with the Flip Cameras I purchased for them for their birthdays. We have been doing all kinds of great movie making and even claymation with them. One of my short term goals this summer is to get my 9 year old and 11 year old more comfortable with various productivity technology tools so they can use them when developing projects for school and creating their own masterpieces. I have also been researching web-based technology to use with them to increase their math facts, spelling accuracy and typing skills (which I could use as well).
My long term goals for school are to be comfortable enough and knowledgeable in current technologies that I can apply to my own classroom. I am hoping to have a classroom of my own in the fall and I would like to use blogging, wikis, and a classroom website to help with my teaching. I think it is true that if you don’t use it you lose it, so I plan on staying on top of current issues and research in this area throughout my career. This will mean that I will need to attend and even organize, professional development meetings about it and continue into the official master’s program for my Educational Technology degree.
I think I can honestly say that at this point in my life I am finally comfortable enough with technology that I don’t feel like I am walking uphill in sand every time I try something new. I no longer yell at my computer and get so impatient with it that I think it has it out for me when something goes wrong (ok, once or twice I may freak a little). I am now more comfortable and confident using technology both at school and home. This means that I am utilizing it more effectively and it is truly starting to be a “change with a difference” in my life!
Saturday, April 24, 2010
Friday, April 23, 2010
Tech Quest Evaluation
I have written my TechQuest project about math fact fluency and incorporating a program called FASTT Math into the math curriculum. Because I have written my paper to submit for funding, I have continually taken notes and done research on all aspects of the program.
I was able to do a very short trial tutorial to see how all the sections of FASTT Math work. I have also discussed the concept and implementation with other teachers in my building to get feedback and input from them about concerns and practical application ideas.
One of the surprises I came across when talking to the teachers in my building about the program was the fact that they were all in support of it. Across the curriculum, in grades 5th through 8th, all the teachers I talked to in both science and math expressed concerned about the student's math fact fluency and thought intervention by using a program such as FASTT Math could be beneficial.
However, just as surprising, all of the teachers I spoke with expressed concern about finding the time to schedule the actual computer program into their already busy schedules. The 6th through 8th grade teachers were concerned that taking 15 minutes out of their math curriculum instructional time would not be beneficial and even detrimental to their teaching. The fifth grade teachers were more receptive to the idea because of the way their day is set up. The six fifth grade teachers I talked to were supportive of the idea and thought they could squeeze it into their curriculum three days a week and maybe even a fourth day.
I didn't expect such a strong resistance to the scheduling of the program in most classrooms. I know the middle school is designed differently from elementary in terms of classroom times and rotations so I thought of another implementation for that style of teaching. In the future, I would recommend that this program be implemented in an academic extension class that our school has for each grade 6th-8th. The A.E. classes meet daily for 50 minutes. After interviewing the staff and doing more research, I think that this would be a great alternative for our school. There could be a math foundations class that could rotate the kids through this program and include additional math resources and games for the students to utilize. This would also be a more economical alternative for the school.
I would approach another project of this type differently in the future based on what I have learned. One of the first steps I would do next time, after identifying the problem and a possible solution, would be to discuss the application of the solution with other teachers and administrators in my building to get their thoughts on it before I even started. This would allow me to address and focus on immediate concerns before I even started the research. It would also help me to narrow down and really focus on the specific concerns for the people that would need to support my proposal in the future. I think this would help to make a smoother implementation.
One of the big lessons that I have learned is that there are wonderful resources and information out there to help teachers and students but access, money, and scheduling always seem to be the road blocks to utilization. It is worth the struggle and time to fight for tools that you think are beneficial for your students so don't give up easily. Based on my research and interviews, I do think that the FASTT Math program is worth the money and frustration to get it into the math curriculum for fifth grade or an A.E. format for the sixth through eighth grades. Hopefully, I will be able to use the program in some capacity next year.
I would definitely invest the time and energy into doing another TechQuest in the future. I think that it is a very helpful process to really think through and fine-tune ideas about ways technology can solve educational problems. I will change some of the steps I go through in this process next time by focusing more energy on the beginning research and input from peers. This would help to save a great deal of time and focus the project better. This has been a very worthwhile process and one that I will repeat in the future!
I was able to do a very short trial tutorial to see how all the sections of FASTT Math work. I have also discussed the concept and implementation with other teachers in my building to get feedback and input from them about concerns and practical application ideas.
One of the surprises I came across when talking to the teachers in my building about the program was the fact that they were all in support of it. Across the curriculum, in grades 5th through 8th, all the teachers I talked to in both science and math expressed concerned about the student's math fact fluency and thought intervention by using a program such as FASTT Math could be beneficial.
However, just as surprising, all of the teachers I spoke with expressed concern about finding the time to schedule the actual computer program into their already busy schedules. The 6th through 8th grade teachers were concerned that taking 15 minutes out of their math curriculum instructional time would not be beneficial and even detrimental to their teaching. The fifth grade teachers were more receptive to the idea because of the way their day is set up. The six fifth grade teachers I talked to were supportive of the idea and thought they could squeeze it into their curriculum three days a week and maybe even a fourth day.
I didn't expect such a strong resistance to the scheduling of the program in most classrooms. I know the middle school is designed differently from elementary in terms of classroom times and rotations so I thought of another implementation for that style of teaching. In the future, I would recommend that this program be implemented in an academic extension class that our school has for each grade 6th-8th. The A.E. classes meet daily for 50 minutes. After interviewing the staff and doing more research, I think that this would be a great alternative for our school. There could be a math foundations class that could rotate the kids through this program and include additional math resources and games for the students to utilize. This would also be a more economical alternative for the school.
I would approach another project of this type differently in the future based on what I have learned. One of the first steps I would do next time, after identifying the problem and a possible solution, would be to discuss the application of the solution with other teachers and administrators in my building to get their thoughts on it before I even started. This would allow me to address and focus on immediate concerns before I even started the research. It would also help me to narrow down and really focus on the specific concerns for the people that would need to support my proposal in the future. I think this would help to make a smoother implementation.
One of the big lessons that I have learned is that there are wonderful resources and information out there to help teachers and students but access, money, and scheduling always seem to be the road blocks to utilization. It is worth the struggle and time to fight for tools that you think are beneficial for your students so don't give up easily. Based on my research and interviews, I do think that the FASTT Math program is worth the money and frustration to get it into the math curriculum for fifth grade or an A.E. format for the sixth through eighth grades. Hopefully, I will be able to use the program in some capacity next year.
I would definitely invest the time and energy into doing another TechQuest in the future. I think that it is a very helpful process to really think through and fine-tune ideas about ways technology can solve educational problems. I will change some of the steps I go through in this process next time by focusing more energy on the beginning research and input from peers. This would help to save a great deal of time and focus the project better. This has been a very worthwhile process and one that I will repeat in the future!
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Tech Quest Implementation Podcast
My TechQuest was written to an audience of teachers and administrators to request funding and support of the Fastt Math software program. The implementation podcast below takes you through the necessary steps for successful implementation for such a project once funding has been approved.
Monday, April 5, 2010
Research for TechQuest Project
Research for TechQuest Project: A Compelling Mathematical Dilema
I was amazed at how much information I found on the topic of math fact fluency. Quite frankly, growing up, I just thought that it was something the teachers did to torture us. I thought it was old school teaching to emphasize drill and practice of math facts. Timed math facts tests and “star charts” posted on the wall for everyone to see who the math geniuses of the group were tormented me throughout grade school. Now that I am a teacher and I can see the negative effects on students when they do not have automaticity and fluency when solving math problems I am researching the very topic I was so intimidated by and frustrated with while growing up. I do have to say that we have come a long way in this area and hopefully there are only a limited number of actual “star charts” posted in classrooms for everyone to see each others rankings.
As I began the research I first wanted to make sure that I had a valid concern that was backed up by research. I had seen first-hand, time and time again, that students in grades fifth through eighth were struggling through more difficult math concepts and multi-step problems if they didn’t have automatic math fact recall. Unfortunately, this is a much bigger problem than I had originally thought. So fortunately, there is a lot of research about it.
I started off my search by looking for journal articles and studies to support my theory that a deficit in math fact recall will negatively affect a student’s math ability in the middle school grades and beyond. I started off by using the MSU Libraries on line. This was incredibly helpful. By just searching “math facts fluency” through a ProQuest basic search I was able to locate hundreds of articles that related to my topic. However, a lot of these results were just software suggestions or other non-essential topics that I wasn’t looking for. Then I did some more advanced searches with the subject of education and teaching math fact fluency. I was also able to search for current articles by including date parameters. I did not realize the “math wars” that have been going on for decades around this subject. I was able to tab and save research through the MSU library site on twelve different resources that all directly related to the validity of my TechQuest topic. I have listed four of the best resources I found through MSU Libraries below. I have also gone to the source and linked the title of each article to the full online version or the ProQuest link.
The New York Times:
Report Urges Changes in Teaching Math
• After hearing testimony and comments from hundreds of organizations and individuals, and sifting through a broad array of 16,000 research publications, the panelists shaped their report around recent research on how children learn.
I was amazed at how much information I found on the topic of math fact fluency. Quite frankly, growing up, I just thought that it was something the teachers did to torture us. I thought it was old school teaching to emphasize drill and practice of math facts. Timed math facts tests and “star charts” posted on the wall for everyone to see who the math geniuses of the group were tormented me throughout grade school. Now that I am a teacher and I can see the negative effects on students when they do not have automaticity and fluency when solving math problems I am researching the very topic I was so intimidated by and frustrated with while growing up. I do have to say that we have come a long way in this area and hopefully there are only a limited number of actual “star charts” posted in classrooms for everyone to see each others rankings.
As I began the research I first wanted to make sure that I had a valid concern that was backed up by research. I had seen first-hand, time and time again, that students in grades fifth through eighth were struggling through more difficult math concepts and multi-step problems if they didn’t have automatic math fact recall. Unfortunately, this is a much bigger problem than I had originally thought. So fortunately, there is a lot of research about it.
I started off my search by looking for journal articles and studies to support my theory that a deficit in math fact recall will negatively affect a student’s math ability in the middle school grades and beyond. I started off by using the MSU Libraries on line. This was incredibly helpful. By just searching “math facts fluency” through a ProQuest basic search I was able to locate hundreds of articles that related to my topic. However, a lot of these results were just software suggestions or other non-essential topics that I wasn’t looking for. Then I did some more advanced searches with the subject of education and teaching math fact fluency. I was also able to search for current articles by including date parameters. I did not realize the “math wars” that have been going on for decades around this subject. I was able to tab and save research through the MSU library site on twelve different resources that all directly related to the validity of my TechQuest topic. I have listed four of the best resources I found through MSU Libraries below. I have also gone to the source and linked the title of each article to the full online version or the ProQuest link.
The New York Times:
Report Urges Changes in Teaching Math
• After hearing testimony and comments from hundreds of organizations and individuals, and sifting through a broad array of 16,000 research publications, the panelists shaped their report around recent research on how children learn.
• For example, the report found it is important for students to master their basic math facts well enough that their recall becomes automatic, stored in their long-term memory, leaving room in their working memory to take in new math processes.
• ''For all content areas, practice allows students to achieve automaticity of basic skills -- the fast, accurate and effortless processing of content information -- which frees up working memory for more complex aspects of problem solving,'' the report said.
• Dr. Faulkner, a former president of the University of Texas at Austin, said the panel ''buys the notion from cognitive science that kids have to know the facts.''
Lewin, T. (2008, March 14). Report urges changes in teaching math. New York Times, section A; Column O; National Desk; Page 17.
The Wall Street Journal:
Arithmetic Problem: New Report Urges Return to Basics in Teaching Math; Critics of 'Fuzzy' Methods Cheer Educators' Findings; Drills without Calculators; Taking Cues from Singapore
• The nation's math teachers, on the front lines of a 17-year curriculum war, are getting some new marching orders: Make sure students learn the basics.
• In a report to be released today, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, which represents 100,000 educators from prekindergarten through college, will give ammunition to traditionalists who believe schools should focus heavily and early on teaching such fundamentals as multiplication tables and long division.
• The council's advice is striking because in 1989 it touched off the so-called math wars by promoting open-ended problem solving over drilling. Back then, it recommended that students as young as those in kindergarten use calculators in class.
John Hechinger. (2006, September 12). Arithmetic Problem: New Report Urges Return to Basics In Teaching Math; Critics of 'Fuzzy' Methods Cheer Educators' Findings; Drills Without Calculators; Taking Cues From Singapore. Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition), p. A.1. Retrieved April 5, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1125933101).
Phi Delta Kappan:
Endless Ping-Pong Over Math Education
The reason cited by many critics for U.S. students' having fallen below the ridiculous "first in the world" declaration of Goals 2000 is that they don't learn the fundamentals. Math reforms, they say, focus too much on learning through applied practice and not enough on learning through necessary rote methods. This was the basis of the "math wars" in California several years ago.
Anne C Lewis. (2005). Endless Ping-Pong Over Math Education. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(6), 420-421. Retrieved April 5, 2010, from Research Library Core. (Document ID: 796601741).
Education Week:
Panel Calls for Systematic, Basic Approach to Math; Federal advisory group's proposals may reignite debate on 'broken' content and instruction
• Nearly two years in the making, the report went through 90 drafts, with its members wrestling over major recommendations and individual words and phrases. It was approved unanimously at the panel's final meeting, held March 13 at Longfellow Middle School here in a suburb of the nation's capital.
• The 90-page document calls for the math curriculum to be streamlined in pre-K-8, a strategy it calls putting "first things first." Students need to be grounded in both the effortless, automatic recall of simple procedures and in the acquisition of broader problem-solving skills. Too often, those skills are wrongly presented as incompatible, the report says.
• At various points, the authors also allude to the enduring philosophical battles over how to teach the subject--commonly referred to as "the math wars." Those disputes tend to pit those who argue that students should be grounded more firmly in simple math procedures against others who advocate a more conceptual approach to teaching and learning.
• "Debates regarding the relative importance of these aspects of mathematical knowledge are misguided," the report says. "These capabilities are mutually supportive, each facilitating the learning of the other."
Sean Cavanagh. (2008, March). Panel Calls for Systematic, Basic Approach to Math:Federal advisory group's proposals may reignite debate on 'broken' content and instruction. Education Week, 27(28), 1,12. Retrieved April 5, 2010, from Research Library Core. (Document ID: 1454317041).
My next research stop was to the U.S. Department of Education website (Ed.gov) to search for more related information there. I found The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. This is a very interesting report that all math and elementary teachers should read. It really backs up my theory.
U.S. Department of Education:
The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
• To prepare students for Algebra, the curriculum must simultaneously develop conceptual understanding, computational fluency, and problem solving skills. Debates regarding the relative importance of these aspects of mathematical knowledge are misguided. These capabilities are mutually supportive, each facilitating learning of the others. Teachers should emphasize these interrelations; taken together, conceptual understanding of mathematical operations, fluent execution of procedures, and fast access to number combinations jointly support effective and efficient problem solving.
• Computational proficiency with whole number operations is dependent on sufficient and appropriate practice to develop automatic recall of addition and related subtraction facts, and of multiplication and related division facts. It also requires fluency with the standard algorithms for addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
• Research on instructional software has generally shown positive effects on students’ achievement in mathematics as compared with instruction that does not incorporate such technologies. These studies show that technology-based drill and practice and tutorials can improve student performance in specific areas of mathematics.
After my surfing and searching through Google I also found this great website called the Center for Implementing Technology in Education. They have an entire research center you can search for relevant information. I found a great research paper related to my TechQuest.
Center for Implementing Technology in Education:
Technology Supported Math Instruction for Students with Disabilities: Two Decades of Research and Development.
• A variety of technologies are available to enhance students’ mathematical competency by building their declarative, procedural, and conceptual knowledge. The remainder of this paper will review these technologies. This review will be guided by the NCTI Mathematics Matrix found at http://www.citeducation.org/mathmatrix. The matrix identifies six purposes of technology use for supporting student mathematical learning, including (1) building computational fluency;…
• Declarative knowledge is developed through technologies that help build computational fluency.
The research on computational fluency suggests that the ability to fluently recall the answers to basic math facts is a necessary condition for attaining higher-order math skills. The rationale for this thinking is that all human beings have a limited information-processing capacity. That is, an individual simply cannot attend to too many things at once. Grover Whitehurst, the Director of the Institute for Educational Sciences (IES), noted this research during the launch of the federal Math Summit (2003):
Cognitive psychologists have discovered that humans have fixed limits on the attention and memory that can be used to solve problems. One way around these limits is to have certain components of a task become so routine and over-learned that they become automatic.
• The implication for mathematics is that some of the sub-processes, particularly basic facts, need to be developed to the point that they are done fluently and automatically. If this fluent retrieval does not develop, then the development of higher-order mathematics skills—such as multiple-digit addition and subtraction, long division, and fractions—may be severely impaired (Resnick, 1983). Indeed, studies have found that lack of math fact retrieval can impede participation in math class discussions (Woodward & Baxter, 1997), successful mathematics problem-solving (Pellegrino & Goldman, 1987), and even the development of everyday life skills (Loveless, 2003). And rapid math-fact retrieval has been shown to be a strong predictor of performance on mathematics achievement tests (Royer, Tronsky, Chan, Jackson, & Merchant, 1999).
• While the research cited above highlights the importance of math fact fluency, the computation capabilities of American students might well be diminishing. Tom Loveless of the Brookings Institute has reviewed responses to select items on the NAEP and concluded that performance on basic arithmetic facts declined in the 1990s (2003). More emphasis needs to be placed on developing rapid, effortless, and errorless recall of basic math facts.
I decided to search using Bing next. I searched for “research math computation fluency”. I found a great research project on FASTT Math and I even emailed the two teachers that implemented it. I am waiting to hear back from them to see if I can site some of their findings. This is the same program I was going to try and use.
What Is the Relationship Between Fluency and Automaticity through Systematic Teaching with Technology (FASTT Math) and Improved Student Computational Skills?
Patty Lehner; Virginia Beach City Public Schools; November 30, 2008
FASTT Math
I have streamlined my focus and I have discovered that trying to recreate the wheel is not necessary. My original goal was to implement my idea using free resources and websites with a math log; however, I am now seeing the advantages to using one database or program to implement my TechQuest. The ability for a program to interpret student ability and customize a program for each individual is critical for long term success. There were a number of programs I came across while conducting my research.
One of the programs that I continued to see over and over again was FASTT Math (Fluency and Automaticity through Systematic Teaching with Technology). I found different research studies that have been done using this program and they all seem to have had success. Some of the research I found to support the use of FASTT Math I have listed below.
This is a basic overview of the FASTT Math idea: Using FASTT Math (Fluency and Automaticity through Systematic Teaching with Technology), struggling students, grades 2 – up, develop fluency with basic math facts in addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. The software moves beyond traditional drill and practice to assess each student's level and to provide a continuously adaptive program that increases fluency in customized, 10-minute daily sessions. FASTT Math also includes prescribed print activities for those students who need additional instruction in the conceptual foundation of numbers and operations.
Product Features
• Research-based and validated • Authored by Ted Hasselbring and Laura Goin • Students practice basic facts in addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division • Customized course of study for each student, based on individual assessments • Frequent, short practice sessions • Choice of two fact ranges: 0-9 or 0-12 • Generates customized worksheets for additional practice • 12 detailed performance and usage reports at the student, class, grade, and school levels for teachers and administrators • Teacher’s Guide with assessments and lesson plans • Fact Fluency Foundations Guide with age-appropriate activities for counting, number concepts, and computation strategies • Bilingual — switch easily between English and Spanish • Meets guidelines for universal accessibility and Meets State and National Standards
Students will:
Learn basic facts in addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division; Be able to recall facts from memory; Develop fluency with multi-digit problems in each operation; Gain the foundation necessary for success in higher-order problem
solving.
For more information or to request an evaluation version or a research report call Tom Snyder Productions at (800)342-0236 or log on to http://www.tomsnyder.com/
Research to back up the FASTT Math program:
The following excerpt is taken from Technology Supported Math Instruction for Students with Disabilities: Two Decades of Research and Development.
Developing Fluency in Math Delayed Children using Technology
To counteract the problem described above, educators have turned to technology with varying degrees of success to help students achieve fluency in math facts. Although it seems intuitive that using technology in a drill-and-practice format helps students develop the declarative fact knowledge, evidence suggests that this is not the case. In an early study by Hasselbring, Goin, and Sherwood (1986), it was found that computerized drill and practice was ineffective in developing declarative fact knowledge in students with math difficulty. The identified problem was that typical drill-and-practice software was designed in such a way that students were practicing “procedural counting” strategies instead of developing the ability to recall facts from memory. As a matter of fact, even studies that report reduced response latencies as a result of the use of computerized drill and practice could not demonstrate that facts were being retrieved from memory, only that procedural counting time was reduced (Christensen & Gerber, 1990; Pellegrino & Goldman, 1987).
As a result of this research, Hasselbring and Goin (2005) developed an intervention paradigm called FASTT (Fluency and Automaticity through Systematic Teaching with Technology) designed to assist students in the development of declarative fact knowledge. The FASTT approach has been used successfully to develop mathematical fluency. It appears that the key to making the retrieval of basic math facts fluent is to first establish a mental link between the facts and their answers which must be stored in long term memory. FASTT embodies several unique design features to help develop these relationships. These 7 features include the following:
1. Identification of fluent and non-fluent facts;
2. Restricted presentation of non-fluent information;
3. Student generation of problem/answer pairs;
4. Use of "challenge times;"
5. Spaced-presentation of non-fluent information;
6. The appropriate use of drill-and-practice; and
7. Computer monitoring of student performance.
Each of the above features has been incorporated into a software program, called FASTT Math (2005) designed specifically to develop declarative fact knowledge.
There is a FASTT Math Research Foundation site that shows all kinds of interesting statistics and research that has been conducted on this program. Of course, this is also the same site you can order from so it is always important to keep that in mind.
Again, I refer to the study done by two teachers that I have emailed and hope to hear back from.
What Is the Relationship Between Fluency and Automaticity through Systematic Teaching with Technology (FASTT Math) and Improved Student Computational Skills?
Patty Lehner; Virginia Beach City Public Schools; November 30, 2008
Research Summary
Overall, I found more than enough information to help me with my TechQuest. Honestly, I could have done research for weeks. I will admit than I am one to use Google too often and not expand my search. I am so glad I used so many different search engines and methods this time. Yes, there was some overlap but honestly I found new and exciting references in each location! The MSU Libraries were probably the most helpful in keeping my search focused and on target so I didn’t have to weed through tons of “junk”. I was disappointed with my EduHound search. There were some references to testing results; however, most of the sites were linking me to math teaching ideas and websites that were more about classroom tools and tips.
Based on the research I have conducted I think that I have a very valid problem of practice and a good start to helping solve the problem using technology. Some of the barriers and complications to conducting this TechQuest will be the costs and access to a classroom since I am currently a building substitute teacher. I have decided to write this up as a proposal for future implementation in a school I hope to be working in next year.
Friday, March 26, 2010
Tech Quest Project Description
A Compelling Mathematical Dilemma
As a middle school building substitute teacher I have a very unique perspective on how the curriculum spirals through grades 5th to 8th. I spend a lot of time in math classes from general education classrooms and the academic resource room, to eighth grade honors algebra. I have noticed something in each setting that has become quite obvious; the students that do not have math fact fluency and a solid understanding of basic mathematical principles will be negatively impacted both academically and emotionally in this subject area as they progress through middle school.
To prepare students for more complex math classes like Algebra they need to have a strong foundation in computational fluency. It has been shown that fast access to number combinations supports effective and efficient problem solving. Computational fluency is achieved with sufficient and appropriate practice to develop automatic recall of math facts. This frees up the brain’s working memory so that more attention can be given to more complex tasks. (Final Report 2008)
Cognitive psychologists have discovered that humans have fixed limits on the attention and memory that can be used to solve problems. One way around these limits is to have certain components of a task become so routine and over-learned that they become automatic. (CITEd 2003)
Both the NCTM's Curriculum Focal Points and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report emphasize that developing fact automaticity is crucial to the successful mastery of number concepts and algebraic reasoning.
Teachers are overwhelmed with all the curriculum standards and benchmarks that we are responsible for and many times basic math facts are left to practice at home. There is a large discrepancy in the amount of time individual students spend on this task. I think that using technology to help students with the foundation of math fact fluency and basic mathematical principles could help them achieve more confidence and academic success. This would help prevent many students from getting turned off to math in the middle school years. Many students get so frustrated with multi-step problems because they get bogged down in the details. If they make an error in the first couple steps of the problem they can actually get the process right but the answer wrong so they feel like they are failures or that they just aren’t good at math. Who would want to read a novel if they didn’t have a repertoire of sight words? If you had to struggle through every other word the novel it wouldn’t make sense and it would be too frustrating to even attempt to read so you would give up. This same negative math mentality can carry over into high school and college and really limit career and job choices in the future. Getting students more confident and comfortable in this subject area is critical in this age range.
Technology to the Rescue
I believe this educational issue can be addressed with the use of relevant technology. Practice alone is not enough. Immediate feedback, individualized instruction and consistent use with guidance from a teacher is critical to the success of such a plan. There are many technology resources that can be utilized and implemented both in school and at home. We know that reading logs are effective in getting our students to read which leads to more fluency in reading and writing. The same is true for math. The more the student is exposed to math facts and basic mathematical concepts the more fluent they will become in the math area as well. I think of it like sight words for math. I believe that using technology and maintaining a math log would help to accomplish this goal. A daily requirement of just 10 minutes of math practice would be very beneficial.
Just randomly playing math games online may be helpful to some degree; however, after doing research on this topic it is obvious that consistency and individualized instruction is vital to the success of any program for positive long term benefits.
Research does support this theory: The Panel recommends that high-quality computer assisted instruction (CAI) drill and practice, implemented with fidelity, be considered as a useful tool in developing students’ automaticity (i.e., fast , accurate, and effortless performance on computation), freeing working memory so that attention can be directed to the more complicated aspects of complex tasks. (Final Report 2008)
The technology resources necessary to increase math confidence and fluency are in most schools already. It would be more advantageous if students had daily access to computers and software, however this could be done with possible alternatives as well. Teacher implementation and tracking is minimal and the costs could be low depending on software use and computer accessibility.
After the initial introduction and modeling of the math log application there would need to be additional follow up in the tracking and recording of individual student progress. The technology program could do this or it could be done with paper and pencil depending on computer accessibility.
Computer Assisted Instruction: Math Programs
One of the biggest advantages to using technology in this area would be the ability to customize practice depending on individual student needs and learning styles. Using technology to achieve math these math goals would be much more advantageous then traditional paper and pencil tasks. All of the programs I have researched allow for customized instruction based on student performance.
I have researched multiple math programs for this task. I have found that there is a huge range in both pricing and flexibility of the programs. There is a very helpful website that has a matrix for 47 different math programs that includes research and descriptions on each one. Some are web based and others are strictly software. The Tech Matrix link is a great resource for finding more information on each program. Unfortunately, there is a cost involved for each program ranging from about $300 for one computer to about $10,000 for school wide access. Of course, these are also some of the most flexible and well managed programs available. Six programs that I found that were very impressive are linked below:
Hey Math
Doma +Unique Math
FASTt Math
Academy of Math
Skills Tutor, Math Fact Fluency
IXL Math
I would recommend purchasing one of the programs for long term benefits in a school setting. Record management and tracking for individual students is included.
I have also researched many web based free resources that I could use immediately in combination with a math log. For the focus in this class I will need to use the free resources online. I will be using them daily with my own two children. I have a third grade student that is just now learning his math facts for multiplication and division. I also have a sixth grade student that is just staring to do order of operations and a more focused algebra curriculum. Her lack of automaticity of math facts is really slowing her down and increasing her frustration. I will have both of them start a daily math log at home and monitor their progress during the next few weeks. The free math sites I have researched and will be using for this project are linked below.
That Quiz for Teachers
Kids Numbers
The disadvantage to the free sites is that they are not adaptive to a skill set and can not be individualized like the programs for purchase.
As a middle school building substitute teacher I have a very unique perspective on how the curriculum spirals through grades 5th to 8th. I spend a lot of time in math classes from general education classrooms and the academic resource room, to eighth grade honors algebra. I have noticed something in each setting that has become quite obvious; the students that do not have math fact fluency and a solid understanding of basic mathematical principles will be negatively impacted both academically and emotionally in this subject area as they progress through middle school.
To prepare students for more complex math classes like Algebra they need to have a strong foundation in computational fluency. It has been shown that fast access to number combinations supports effective and efficient problem solving. Computational fluency is achieved with sufficient and appropriate practice to develop automatic recall of math facts. This frees up the brain’s working memory so that more attention can be given to more complex tasks. (Final Report 2008)
Cognitive psychologists have discovered that humans have fixed limits on the attention and memory that can be used to solve problems. One way around these limits is to have certain components of a task become so routine and over-learned that they become automatic. (CITEd 2003)
Both the NCTM's Curriculum Focal Points and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report emphasize that developing fact automaticity is crucial to the successful mastery of number concepts and algebraic reasoning.
Teachers are overwhelmed with all the curriculum standards and benchmarks that we are responsible for and many times basic math facts are left to practice at home. There is a large discrepancy in the amount of time individual students spend on this task. I think that using technology to help students with the foundation of math fact fluency and basic mathematical principles could help them achieve more confidence and academic success. This would help prevent many students from getting turned off to math in the middle school years. Many students get so frustrated with multi-step problems because they get bogged down in the details. If they make an error in the first couple steps of the problem they can actually get the process right but the answer wrong so they feel like they are failures or that they just aren’t good at math. Who would want to read a novel if they didn’t have a repertoire of sight words? If you had to struggle through every other word the novel it wouldn’t make sense and it would be too frustrating to even attempt to read so you would give up. This same negative math mentality can carry over into high school and college and really limit career and job choices in the future. Getting students more confident and comfortable in this subject area is critical in this age range.
Technology to the Rescue
I believe this educational issue can be addressed with the use of relevant technology. Practice alone is not enough. Immediate feedback, individualized instruction and consistent use with guidance from a teacher is critical to the success of such a plan. There are many technology resources that can be utilized and implemented both in school and at home. We know that reading logs are effective in getting our students to read which leads to more fluency in reading and writing. The same is true for math. The more the student is exposed to math facts and basic mathematical concepts the more fluent they will become in the math area as well. I think of it like sight words for math. I believe that using technology and maintaining a math log would help to accomplish this goal. A daily requirement of just 10 minutes of math practice would be very beneficial.
Just randomly playing math games online may be helpful to some degree; however, after doing research on this topic it is obvious that consistency and individualized instruction is vital to the success of any program for positive long term benefits.
Research does support this theory: The Panel recommends that high-quality computer assisted instruction (CAI) drill and practice, implemented with fidelity, be considered as a useful tool in developing students’ automaticity (i.e., fast , accurate, and effortless performance on computation), freeing working memory so that attention can be directed to the more complicated aspects of complex tasks. (Final Report 2008)
The technology resources necessary to increase math confidence and fluency are in most schools already. It would be more advantageous if students had daily access to computers and software, however this could be done with possible alternatives as well. Teacher implementation and tracking is minimal and the costs could be low depending on software use and computer accessibility.
After the initial introduction and modeling of the math log application there would need to be additional follow up in the tracking and recording of individual student progress. The technology program could do this or it could be done with paper and pencil depending on computer accessibility.
Computer Assisted Instruction: Math Programs
One of the biggest advantages to using technology in this area would be the ability to customize practice depending on individual student needs and learning styles. Using technology to achieve math these math goals would be much more advantageous then traditional paper and pencil tasks. All of the programs I have researched allow for customized instruction based on student performance.
I have researched multiple math programs for this task. I have found that there is a huge range in both pricing and flexibility of the programs. There is a very helpful website that has a matrix for 47 different math programs that includes research and descriptions on each one. Some are web based and others are strictly software. The Tech Matrix link is a great resource for finding more information on each program. Unfortunately, there is a cost involved for each program ranging from about $300 for one computer to about $10,000 for school wide access. Of course, these are also some of the most flexible and well managed programs available. Six programs that I found that were very impressive are linked below:
Hey Math
Doma +Unique Math
FASTt Math
Academy of Math
Skills Tutor, Math Fact Fluency
IXL Math
I would recommend purchasing one of the programs for long term benefits in a school setting. Record management and tracking for individual students is included.
I have also researched many web based free resources that I could use immediately in combination with a math log. For the focus in this class I will need to use the free resources online. I will be using them daily with my own two children. I have a third grade student that is just now learning his math facts for multiplication and division. I also have a sixth grade student that is just staring to do order of operations and a more focused algebra curriculum. Her lack of automaticity of math facts is really slowing her down and increasing her frustration. I will have both of them start a daily math log at home and monitor their progress during the next few weeks. The free math sites I have researched and will be using for this project are linked below.
That Quiz for Teachers
Kids Numbers
The disadvantage to the free sites is that they are not adaptive to a skill set and can not be individualized like the programs for purchase.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Reflection of CEP 811
Before this course I still thought that technology could hold it's own in the educational environment to help motivate and educate the students. My eyes are really opening to the fact that without specific teaching strategies addressed with the use of the technology, not only does it lose it's value, but it can also hinder student's learning by just becoming a distraction. Effective teaching strategies should be the "pathway" or "map" we use to help us develop powerful and productive technology integration into our curriculum.
I have had a difficult time being the "guide on the side" in the past. I am starting to understand the impact of letting the students do WebQuests and StAirs and become more involved in their own learning and discoveries. In the past I have relied more on the "sage on the stage" approach because I thought I had to be in control and cover all the curriculum guidelines exactly how I saw fit. What I am learning is that you have to let the students be more responsible for their own learning through problem solving and discovery based projects using the technology that is available. This is definitely an area I will continue to grow in.
Before CEP 811 I was extremely intimidated by the thought of making a web page and I had no idea at all how to link things together. Honestly, I didn't even understand how this whole internet thing worked. I now see the organization of it and the "big picture" better. The whole "host" thing was news to me. I am really feeling much more comfortable now. Instead of asking for my hubby's help at every turn, I will try to figure out the "glitch" myself and I have even taught him a few things.
I have learned a lot more about blogging as well. I didn't know you could set up authors and set parameters for who could comment. I can now see this as a very valuable teaching tool.
It was fascinating to read everyone's thoughts about how to implement various technology in their classroom. It really gave me some great ideas. I have started keeping a list of these in a special file that I can refer back to in the future. I am also saving a lot of the 'tips and tricks' ideas in a file.
In the future, I want to learn more about setting up virtual classrooms and keeping track of student records and assessments on the computer and with electronic portfolios.
I have had a difficult time being the "guide on the side" in the past. I am starting to understand the impact of letting the students do WebQuests and StAirs and become more involved in their own learning and discoveries. In the past I have relied more on the "sage on the stage" approach because I thought I had to be in control and cover all the curriculum guidelines exactly how I saw fit. What I am learning is that you have to let the students be more responsible for their own learning through problem solving and discovery based projects using the technology that is available. This is definitely an area I will continue to grow in.
Before CEP 811 I was extremely intimidated by the thought of making a web page and I had no idea at all how to link things together. Honestly, I didn't even understand how this whole internet thing worked. I now see the organization of it and the "big picture" better. The whole "host" thing was news to me. I am really feeling much more comfortable now. Instead of asking for my hubby's help at every turn, I will try to figure out the "glitch" myself and I have even taught him a few things.
I have learned a lot more about blogging as well. I didn't know you could set up authors and set parameters for who could comment. I can now see this as a very valuable teaching tool.
It was fascinating to read everyone's thoughts about how to implement various technology in their classroom. It really gave me some great ideas. I have started keeping a list of these in a special file that I can refer back to in the future. I am also saving a lot of the 'tips and tricks' ideas in a file.
In the future, I want to learn more about setting up virtual classrooms and keeping track of student records and assessments on the computer and with electronic portfolios.
Monday, March 1, 2010
Using Moodle in the Classroom
I may have a teaching position in the fall that will require me to teach two virtual classes in a middle school setting for science. This will require me to design and set up an interactive, live classroom environment and get everything organized and submitted using the technology tools I choose.
I have heard the word Moodle tossed around in the school I teach in but I have never taken the time to explore what it really is. After exploring Moodle I discovered that it is very flexible and easy to use for both teacher and student. It would not require much additional training to use it and it seems very flexible in the way it is set up. Students would have an easy time navigating their way through it and as the teacher, I can set it up on a format that suits my own needs. I did find a great exmple of Moodle use in the following link. It is an excellent example of multi-media applications (video, short response, calendars etc.)using the Moodle format.
http://moodle.clackesd.k12.or.us/course/view.php?id=62
I definitely think that this could be modified to teach science, language arts, math and even social studies. The hardest part would be to incorporate hands on labs in science for the studnets. i do know that you can order lab kits that rae complete for shipping to classrooms all over the world. Of course these are not cheap and the selections are limited.
"Live" teaching with demonstartions and labs may prove to be a little awkward at first but I think I will get used to it.
Deductive and inductive teaching could be utilized very easily through this mode of learning. A teacher would definitely have to be sensitive to incorporating a variety of learning strategies and not get stuck in a rut when utilizing this type of technology.
I have heard the word Moodle tossed around in the school I teach in but I have never taken the time to explore what it really is. After exploring Moodle I discovered that it is very flexible and easy to use for both teacher and student. It would not require much additional training to use it and it seems very flexible in the way it is set up. Students would have an easy time navigating their way through it and as the teacher, I can set it up on a format that suits my own needs. I did find a great exmple of Moodle use in the following link. It is an excellent example of multi-media applications (video, short response, calendars etc.)using the Moodle format.
http://moodle.clackesd.k12.or.us/course/view.php?id=62
I definitely think that this could be modified to teach science, language arts, math and even social studies. The hardest part would be to incorporate hands on labs in science for the studnets. i do know that you can order lab kits that rae complete for shipping to classrooms all over the world. Of course these are not cheap and the selections are limited.
"Live" teaching with demonstartions and labs may prove to be a little awkward at first but I think I will get used to it.
Deductive and inductive teaching could be utilized very easily through this mode of learning. A teacher would definitely have to be sensitive to incorporating a variety of learning strategies and not get stuck in a rut when utilizing this type of technology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)